FindBugs Bug DescriptionsThis document lists the standard bug patterns reported by FindBugs version 1.3.4. SummaryDescriptionsAM: Creates an empty jar file entry (AM_CREATES_EMPTY_JAR_FILE_ENTRY)The code calls AM: Creates an empty zip file entry (AM_CREATES_EMPTY_ZIP_FILE_ENTRY)The code calls BC: Equals method should not assume anything about the type of its argument (BC_EQUALS_METHOD_SHOULD_WORK_FOR_ALL_OBJECTS)
The BC: Random object created and used only once (DMI_RANDOM_USED_ONLY_ONCE)This code creates a java.util.Random object, uses it to generate one random number, and then discards the Random object. This produces mediocre quality random numbers and is inefficient. If possible, rewrite the code so that the Random object is created once and saved, and each time a new random number is required invoke a method on the existing Random object to obtain it. If it is important that the generated Random numbers not be guessable, you must not create a new Random for each random number; the values are too easily guessable. You should strongly consider using a java.security.SecureRandom instead (and avoid allocating a new SecureRandom for each random number needed). BIT: Check for sign of bitwise operation (BIT_SIGNED_CHECK)This method compares an expression such as ((event.detail & SWT.SELECTED) > 0). Using bit arithmetic and then comparing with the greater than operator can lead to unexpected results (of course depending on the value of SWT.SELECTED). If SWT.SELECTED is a negative number, this is a candidate for a bug. Even when SWT.SELECTED is not negative, it seems good practice to use '!= 0' instead of '> 0'. Boris Bokowski CN: Class implements Cloneable but does not define or use clone method (CN_IDIOM)Class implements Cloneable but does not define or use the clone method. CN: clone method does not call super.clone() (CN_IDIOM_NO_SUPER_CALL)This non-final class defines a clone() method that does not call super.clone(). If this class ("A") is extended by a subclass ("B"), and the subclass B calls super.clone(), then it is likely that B's clone() method will return an object of type A, which violates the standard contract for clone(). If all clone() methods call super.clone(), then they are guaranteed to use Object.clone(), which always returns an object of the correct type. CN: Class defines clone() but doesn't implement Cloneable (CN_IMPLEMENTS_CLONE_BUT_NOT_CLONEABLE)This class defines a clone() method but the class doesn't implement Cloneable. There are some situations in which this is OK (e.g., you want to control how subclasses can clone themselves), but just make sure that this is what you intended. Co: Abstract class defines covariant compareTo() method (CO_ABSTRACT_SELF) This class defines a covariant version of Co: Covariant compareTo() method defined (CO_SELF_NO_OBJECT) This class defines a covariant version of DE: Method might drop exception (DE_MIGHT_DROP)This method might drop an exception. In general, exceptions should be handled or reported in some way, or they should be thrown out of the method. DE: Method might ignore exception (DE_MIGHT_IGNORE)This method might ignore an exception. In general, exceptions should be handled or reported in some way, or they should be thrown out of the method. DP: Classloaders should only be created inside doPrivileged block (DP_CREATE_CLASSLOADER_INSIDE_DO_PRIVILEGED)This code creates a classloader, which requires a security manager. If this code will be granted security permissions, but might be invoked by code that does not have security permissions, then the classloader creation needs to occur inside a doPrivileged block. DP: Method invoked that should be only be invoked inside a doPrivileged block (DP_DO_INSIDE_DO_PRIVILEGED)This code invokes a method that requires a security permission check. If this code will be granted security permissions, but might be invoked by code that does not have security permissions, then the invocation needs to occur inside a doPrivileged block. Dm: Method invokes System.exit(...) (DM_EXIT)Invoking System.exit shuts down the entire Java virtual machine. This should only been done when it is appropriate. Such calls make it hard or impossible for your code to be invoked by other code. Consider throwing a RuntimeException instead. Dm: Method invokes dangerous method runFinalizersOnExit (DM_RUN_FINALIZERS_ON_EXIT)Never call System.runFinalizersOnExit or Runtime.runFinalizersOnExit for any reason: they are among the most dangerous methods in the Java libraries. -- Joshua Bloch ES: Comparison of String parameter using == or != (ES_COMPARING_PARAMETER_STRING_WITH_EQ)This code compares a ES: Comparison of String objects using == or != (ES_COMPARING_STRINGS_WITH_EQ)This code compares Eq: Abstract class defines covariant equals() method (EQ_ABSTRACT_SELF) This class defines a covariant version of Eq: Class defines compareTo(...) and uses Object.equals() (EQ_COMPARETO_USE_OBJECT_EQUALS) This class defines a From the JavaDoc for the compareTo method in the Comparable interface:
It is strongly recommended, but not strictly required that
Eq: Covariant equals() method defined (EQ_SELF_NO_OBJECT) This class defines a covariant version of FI: Empty finalizer should be deleted (FI_EMPTY) Empty FI: Explicit invocation of finalizer (FI_EXPLICIT_INVOCATION) This method contains an explicit invocation of the If a connected set of objects beings finalizable, then the VM will invoke the finalize method on all the finalizable object, possibly at the same time in different threads. Thus, it is a particularly bad idea, in the finalize method for a class X, invoke finalize on objects referenced by X, because they may already be getting finalized in a separate thread. FI: Finalizer nulls fields (FI_FINALIZER_NULLS_FIELDS)This finalizer nulls out fields. This is usually an error, as it does not aid garbage collection, and the object is going to be garbage collected anyway. FI: Finalizer only nulls fields (FI_FINALIZER_ONLY_NULLS_FIELDS)This finalizer does nothing except null out fields. This is completely pointless, and requires that the object be garbage collected, finalized, and then garbage collected again. You should just remove the finalize method. FI: Finalizer does not call superclass finalizer (FI_MISSING_SUPER_CALL) This FI: Finalizer nullifies superclass finalizer (FI_NULLIFY_SUPER) This empty FI: Finalizer does nothing but call superclass finalizer (FI_USELESS) The only thing this HE: Class defines equals() but not hashCode() (HE_EQUALS_NO_HASHCODE) This class overrides HE: Class defines equals() and uses Object.hashCode() (HE_EQUALS_USE_HASHCODE) This class overrides If you don't think instances of this class will ever be inserted into a HashMap/HashTable,
the recommended public int hashCode() {
assert false : "hashCode not designed";
return 42; // any arbitrary constant will do
}
HE: Class defines hashCode() but not equals() (HE_HASHCODE_NO_EQUALS) This class defines a HE: Class defines hashCode() and uses Object.equals() (HE_HASHCODE_USE_OBJECT_EQUALS) This class defines a If you don't think instances of this class will ever be inserted into a HashMap/HashTable,
the recommended public int hashCode() {
assert false : "hashCode not designed";
return 42; // any arbitrary constant will do
}
HE: Class inherits equals() and uses Object.hashCode() (HE_INHERITS_EQUALS_USE_HASHCODE) This class inherits If you don't want to define a hashCode method, and/or don't
believe the object will ever be put into a HashMap/Hashtable,
define the IC: Superclass uses subclass during initialization (IC_SUPERCLASS_USES_SUBCLASS_DURING_INITIALIZATION) During the initialization of a class, the class makes an active use of a subclass.
That subclass will not yet be initialized at the time of this use.
For example, in the following code,
public class CircularClassInitialization {
static class InnerClassSingleton extends CircularClassInitialization {
static InnerClassSingleton singleton = new InnerClassSingleton();
}
static CircularClassInitialization foo = InnerClassSingleton.singleton;
}
IMSE: Dubious catching of IllegalMonitorStateException (IMSE_DONT_CATCH_IMSE)IllegalMonitorStateException is generally only thrown in case of a design flaw in your code (calling wait or notify on an object you do not hold a lock on). ISC: Needless instantiation of class that only supplies static methods (ISC_INSTANTIATE_STATIC_CLASS)This class allocates an object that is based on a class that only supplies static methods. This object does not need to be created, just access the static methods directly using the class name as a qualifier. It: Iterator next() method can't throw NoSuchElement exception (IT_NO_SUCH_ELEMENT) This class implements the J2EE: Store of non serializable object into HttpSession (J2EE_STORE_OF_NON_SERIALIZABLE_OBJECT_INTO_SESSION)This code seems to be storing a non-serializable object into an HttpSession. If this session is passivated or migrated, an error will result. NP: Method with Boolean return type returns explicit null (NP_BOOLEAN_RETURN_NULL)A method that returns either Boolean.TRUE, Boolean.FALSE or null is an accident waiting to happen. This method can be invoked as though it returned a value of type boolean, and the compiler will insert automatic unboxing of the Boolean value. If a null value is returned, this will result in a NullPointerException. NP: Clone method may return null (NP_CLONE_COULD_RETURN_NULL)This clone method seems to return null in some circumstances, but clone is never allowed to return a null value. If you are convinced this path is unreachable, throw an AssertionError instead. NP: equals() method does not check for null argument (NP_EQUALS_SHOULD_HANDLE_NULL_ARGUMENT)This implementation of equals(Object) violates the contract defined by java.lang.Object.equals() because it does not check for null being passed as the argument. All equals() methods should return false if passed a null value. NP: toString method may return null (NP_TOSTRING_COULD_RETURN_NULL)This toString method seems to return null in some circumstances. A liberal reading of the spec could be interpreted as allowing this, but it is probably a bad idea and could cause other code to break. Return the empty string or some other appropriate string rather than null. Nm: Class names should start with an upper case letter (NM_CLASS_NAMING_CONVENTION)Class names should be nouns, in mixed case with the first letter of each internal word capitalized. Try to keep your class names simple and descriptive. Use whole words-avoid acronyms and abbreviations (unless the abbreviation is much more widely used than the long form, such as URL or HTML). Nm: Class is not derived from an Exception, even though it is named as such (NM_CLASS_NOT_EXCEPTION)This class is not derived from another exception, but ends with 'Exception'. This will be confusing to users of this class. Nm: Confusing method names (NM_CONFUSING)The referenced methods have names that differ only by capitalization. Nm: Field names should start with a lower case letter (NM_FIELD_NAMING_CONVENTION)Names of fields that are not final should be in mixed case with a lowercase first letter and the first letters of subsequent words capitalized. Nm: Use of identifier that is a keyword in later versions of Java (NM_FUTURE_KEYWORD_USED_AS_IDENTIFIER)The identifier is a word that is reserversed as a keyword in later versions of Java, and your code will need to be changed in order to compile it in later versions of Java. Nm: Use of identifier that is a keyword in later versions of Java (NM_FUTURE_KEYWORD_USED_AS_MEMBER_IDENTIFIER)This identifier is used as a keyword in later versions of Java. This code, and any code that references this API, will need to be changed in order to compile it in later versions of Java. Nm: Method names should start with a lower case letter (NM_METHOD_NAMING_CONVENTION)Methods should be verbs, in mixed case with the first letter lowercase, with the first letter of each internal word capitalized. Nm: Class names shouldn't shadow simple name of implemented interface (NM_SAME_SIMPLE_NAME_AS_INTERFACE) This class/interface has a simple name that is identical to that of an implemented/extended interface, except
that the interface is in a different package (e.g., Nm: Class names shouldn't shadow simple name of superclass (NM_SAME_SIMPLE_NAME_AS_SUPERCLASS) This class has a simple name that is identical to that of its superclass, except
that its superclass is in a different package (e.g., Nm: Very confusing method names (NM_VERY_CONFUSING_INTENTIONAL)The referenced methods have names that differ only by capitalization. This is very confusing because if the capitalization were identical then one of the methods would override the other. From the existence of other methods, it seems that the existence of both of these methods is intentional, but is sure is confusing. You should try hard to eliminate one of them, unless you are forced to have both due to frozen APIs. Nm: Method doesn't override method in superclass due to wrong package for parameter (NM_WRONG_PACKAGE_INTENTIONAL)The method in the subclass doesn't override a similar method in a superclass because the type of a parameter doesn't exactly match the type of the corresponding parameter in the superclass. For example, if you have:
The In this case, the subclass does define a method with a signature identical to the method in the superclass, so this is presumably understood. However, such methods are exceptionally confusing. You should strongly consider removing or deprecating the method with the similar but not identical signature. ODR: Method may fail to close database resource (ODR_OPEN_DATABASE_RESOURCE)The method creates a database resource (such as a database connection or row set), does not assign it to any fields, pass it to other methods, or return it, and does not appear to close the object on all paths out of the method. Failure to close database resources on all paths out of a method may result in poor performance, and could cause the application to have problems communicating with the database. ODR: Method may fail to close database resource on exception (ODR_OPEN_DATABASE_RESOURCE_EXCEPTION_PATH)The method creates a database resource (such as a database connection or row set), does not assign it to any fields, pass it to other methods, or return it, and does not appear to close the object on all exception paths out of the method. Failure to close database resources on all paths out of a method may result in poor performance, and could cause the application to have problems communicating with the database. OS: Method may fail to close stream (OS_OPEN_STREAM) The method creates an IO stream object, does not assign it to any
fields, pass it to other methods that might close it,
or return it, and does not appear to close
the stream on all paths out of the method. This may result in
a file descriptor leak. It is generally a good
idea to use a OS: Method may fail to close stream on exception (OS_OPEN_STREAM_EXCEPTION_PATH) The method creates an IO stream object, does not assign it to any
fields, pass it to other methods, or return it, and does not appear to close
it on all possible exception paths out of the method.
This may result in a file descriptor leak. It is generally a good
idea to use a RC: Suspicious reference comparison (RC_REF_COMPARISON)This method compares two reference values using the == or != operator, where the correct way to compare instances of this type is generally with the equals() method. Examples of classes which should generally not be compared by reference are java.lang.Integer, java.lang.Float, etc. RR: Method ignores results of InputStream.read() (RR_NOT_CHECKED) This method ignores the return value of one of the variants of
RR: Method ignores results of InputStream.skip() (SR_NOT_CHECKED) This method ignores the return value of
RV: Method ignores exceptional return value (RV_RETURN_VALUE_IGNORED_BAD_PRACTICE) This method returns a value that is not checked. The return value should be checked
since it can indicate an unusual or unexpected function execution. For
example, the SI: Static initializer creates instance before all static final fields assigned (SI_INSTANCE_BEFORE_FINALS_ASSIGNED)The class's static initializer creates an instance of the class before all of the static final fields are assigned. SW: Certain swing methods needs to be invoked in Swing thread (SW_SWING_METHODS_INVOKED_IN_SWING_THREAD)(From JDC Tech Tip): The Swing methods show(), setVisible(), and pack() will create the associated peer for the frame. With the creation of the peer, the system creates the event dispatch thread. This makes things problematic because the event dispatch thread could be notifying listeners while pack and validate are still processing. This situation could result in two threads going through the Swing component-based GUI -- it's a serious flaw that could result in deadlocks or other related threading issues. A pack call causes components to be realized. As they are being realized (that is, not necessarily visible), they could trigger listener notification on the event dispatch thread. Se: Non-transient non-serializable instance field in serializable class (SE_BAD_FIELD) This Serializable class defines a non-primitive instance field which is neither transient,
Serializable, or Se: Non-serializable class has a serializable inner class (SE_BAD_FIELD_INNER_CLASS)This Serializable class is an inner class of a non-serializable class. Thus, attempts to serialize it will also attempt to associate instance of the outer class with which it is associated, leading to a runtime error. If possible, making the inner class a static inner class should solve the problem. Making the outer class serializable might also work, but that would mean serializing an instance of the inner class would always also serialize the instance of the outer class, which it often not what you really want. Se: Non-serializable value stored into instance field of a serializable class (SE_BAD_FIELD_STORE)A non-serializable value is stored into a non-transient field of a serializable class. Se: Comparator doesn't implement Serializable (SE_COMPARATOR_SHOULD_BE_SERIALIZABLE) This class implements the Se: Serializable inner class (SE_INNER_CLASS)This Serializable class is an inner class. Any attempt to serialize it will also serialize the associated outer instance. The outer instance is serializable, so this won't fail, but it might serialize a lot more data than intended. If possible, making the inner class a static inner class (also known as a nested class) should solve the problem. Se: Method must be private in order for serialization to work (SE_METHOD_MUST_BE_PRIVATE) This class implements the Se: serialVersionUID isn't final (SE_NONFINAL_SERIALVERSIONID) This class defines a Se: serialVersionUID isn't long (SE_NONLONG_SERIALVERSIONID) This class defines a Se: serialVersionUID isn't static (SE_NONSTATIC_SERIALVERSIONID) This class defines a Se: Class is Serializable but its superclass doesn't define a void constructor (SE_NO_SUITABLE_CONSTRUCTOR) This class implements the Se: Class is Externalizable but doesn't define a void constructor (SE_NO_SUITABLE_CONSTRUCTOR_FOR_EXTERNALIZATION) This class implements the Se: The readResolve method must be declared with a return type of Object. (SE_READ_RESOLVE_MUST_RETURN_OBJECT)In order for the readResolve method to be recognized by the serialization mechanism, it must be declared to have a return type of Object. Se: Transient field that isn't set by deserialization. (SE_TRANSIENT_FIELD_NOT_RESTORED)This class contains a field that is updated at multiple places in the class, thus it seems to be part of the state of the class. However, since the field is marked as transient and not set in readObject or readResolve, it will contain the default value in any deserialized instance of the class. SnVI: Class is Serializable, but doesn't define serialVersionUID (SE_NO_SERIALVERSIONID) This class implements the UI: Usage of GetResource may be unsafe if class is extended (UI_INHERITANCE_UNSAFE_GETRESOURCE)Calling BC: Impossible cast (BC_IMPOSSIBLE_CAST)This cast will always throw a ClassCastException. BC: instanceof will always return false (BC_IMPOSSIBLE_INSTANCEOF)This instanceof test will always return false. Although this is safe, make sure it isn't an indication of some misunderstanding or some other logic error. BIT: Incompatible bit masks (BIT_AND)This method compares an expression of the form (a & C) to D, which will always compare unequal due to the specific values of constants C and D. This may indicate a logic error or typo. BIT: Check to see if ((...) & 0) == 0 (BIT_AND_ZZ)This method compares an expression of the form (a & 0) to 0, which will always compare equal. This may indicate a logic error or typo. BIT: Incompatible bit masks (BIT_IOR)This method compares an expression of the form (a | C) to D. which will always compare unequal due to the specific values of constants C and D. This may indicate a logic error or typo. Typically, this bug occurs because the code wants to perform a membership test in a bit set, but uses the bitwise OR operator ("|") instead of bitwise AND ("&"). BIT: Bitwise OR of signed byte value (BIT_IOR_OF_SIGNED_BYTE) Loads a value from a byte array and performs a bitwise OR with
that value. Values loaded from a byte array are sign extended to 32 bits
before any any bitwise operations are performed on the value.
Thus, if In particular, the following code for packing a byte array into an int is badly wrong:
int result = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < 4; i++)
result = ((result << 8) | b[i]);
The following idiom will work instead:
int result = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < 4; i++)
result = ((result << 8) | (b[i] &s; 0xff));
BIT: Check for sign of bitwise operation (BIT_SIGNED_CHECK_HIGH_BIT)This method compares an expression such as ((event.detail & SWT.SELECTED) > 0). Using bit arithmetic and then comparing with the greater than operator can lead to unexpected results (of course depending on the value of SWT.SELECTED). If SWT.SELECTED is a negative number, this is a candidate for a bug. Even when SWT.SELECTED is not negative, it seems good practice to use '!= 0' instead of '> 0'. Boris Bokowski BOA: Class overrides a method implemented in super class Adapter wrongly (BOA_BADLY_OVERRIDDEN_ADAPTER)This method overrides a method found in a parent class, where that class is an Adapter that implements a listener defined in the java.awt.event or javax.swing.event package. As a result, this method will not get called when the event occurs. Bx: Primitive value is unboxed and coerced for ternary operator (BX_UNBOXED_AND_COERCED_FOR_TERNARY_OPERATOR)A wrapped primitive value is unboxed and converted to another primitive type as part of the
evaluation of a conditional ternary operator (the DLS: Useless assignment in return statement (DLS_DEAD_LOCAL_STORE_IN_RETURN)This statement assigns to a local variable in a return statement. This assignment has effect. Please verify that this statement does the right thing. DLS: Dead store of class literal (DLS_DEAD_STORE_OF_CLASS_LITERAL)
This instruction assigns a class literal to a variable and then never uses it.
The behavior of this differs in Java 1.4 and in Java 5.
In Java 1.4 and earlier, a reference to See Sun's article on Java SE compatibility for more details and examples, and suggestions on how to force class initialization in Java 5. DLS: Overwritten increment (DLS_OVERWRITTEN_INCREMENT)
The code performs an increment operation (e.g., DMI: Bad constant value for month (DMI_BAD_MONTH)This code passes a constant month value outside the expected range of 0..11 to a method. DMI: hasNext method invokes next (DMI_CALLING_NEXT_FROM_HASNEXT)The hasNext() method invokes the next() method. This is almost certainly wrong, since the hasNext() method is not supposed to change the state of the iterator, and the next method is supposed to change the state of the iterator. DMI: Invocation of toString on an array (DMI_INVOKING_TOSTRING_ON_ANONYMOUS_ARRAY)The code invokes toString on an (anonymous) array. Calling toString on an array generates a fairly useless result such as [C@16f0472. Consider using Arrays.toString to convert the array into a readable String that gives the contents of the array. See Programming Puzzlers, chapter 3, puzzle 12. DMI: Invocation of toString on an array (DMI_INVOKING_TOSTRING_ON_ARRAY)The code invokes toString on an array, which will generate a fairly useless result such as [C@16f0472. Consider using Arrays.toString to convert the array into a readable String that gives the contents of the array. See Programming Puzzlers, chapter 3, puzzle 12. DMI: Double.longBitsToDouble invoked on an int (DMI_LONG_BITS_TO_DOUBLE_INVOKED_ON_INT)The Double.longBitsToDouble method is invoked, but a 32 bit int value is passed as an argument. This almostly certainly is not intended and is unlikely to give the intended result. Dm: Can't use reflection to check for presence of annotation with default retention (DMI_ANNOTATION_IS_NOT_VISIBLE_TO_REFLECTION)Unless an annotation has itself been annotated with a @Retention other than the default of source-only retention, the annotation isn't retained in the classfile and can't be observed using reflection (e.g., by using the isAnnotationPresent method). . EC: equals() used to compare array and nonarray (EC_ARRAY_AND_NONARRAY)This method invokes the .equals(Object o) to compare an array and a reference that doesn't seem to be an array. If things being compared are of different types, they are guaranteed to be unequal and the comparison is almost certainly an error. Even if they are both arrays, the equals method on arrays only determines of the two arrays are the same object. To compare the contents of the arrays, use java.util.Arrays.equals(Object[], Object[]). EC: Invocation of equals() on an array, which is equivalent to == (EC_BAD_ARRAY_COMPARE)This method invokes the .equals(Object o) method on an array. Since arrays do not override the equals method of Object, calling equals on an array is the same as comparing their addresses. To compare the contents of the arrays, use java.util.Arrays.equals(Object[], Object[]). EC: Call to equals() with null argument (EC_NULL_ARG) This method calls equals(Object), passing a null value as
the argument. According to the contract of the equals() method,
this call should always return EC: Call to equals() comparing unrelated class and interface (EC_UNRELATED_CLASS_AND_INTERFACE)This method calls equals(Object) on two references, one of which is a class and the other an interface, where neither the class nor any of its non-abstract subclasses implement the interface. Therefore, the objects being compared are unlikely to be members of the same class at runtime (unless some application classes were not analyzed, or dynamic class loading can occur at runtime). According to the contract of equals(), objects of different classes should always compare as unequal; therefore, according to the contract defined by java.lang.Object.equals(Object), the result of this comparison will always be false at runtime. EC: Call to equals() comparing different interface types (EC_UNRELATED_INTERFACES)This method calls equals(Object) on two references of unrelated interface types, where neither is a subtype of the other, and there are no known non-abstract classes which implement both interfaces. Therefore, the objects being compared are unlikely to be members of the same class at runtime (unless some application classes were not analyzed, or dynamic class loading can occur at runtime). According to the contract of equals(), objects of different classes should always compare as unequal; therefore, according to the contract defined by java.lang.Object.equals(Object), the result of this comparison will always be false at runtime. EC: Call to equals() comparing different types (EC_UNRELATED_TYPES)This method calls equals(Object) on two references of different class types with no common subclasses. Therefore, the objects being compared are unlikely to be members of the same class at runtime (unless some application classes were not analyzed, or dynamic class loading can occur at runtime). According to the contract of equals(), objects of different classes should always compare as unequal; therefore, according to the contract defined by java.lang.Object.equals(Object), the result of this comparison will always be false at runtime. EC: Using pointer equality to compare different types (EC_UNRELATED_TYPES_USING_POINTER_EQUALITY)This method uses using pointer equality to compare two references that seem to be of different types. The result of this comparison will always be false at runtime. Eq: equals method always returns false (EQ_ALWAYS_FALSE)This class defines an equals method that always returns false. This means that an object is not equal to itself, and it is impossible to create useful Maps or Sets of this class. More fundementally, it means that equals is not reflexive, one of the requirements of the equals method. The likely intended semantics are object identity: that an object is equal to itself. This is the behavior inherited from class
public boolean equals(Object o) { return this == o; }
Eq: equals method always returns true (EQ_ALWAYS_TRUE)This class defines an equals method that always returns true. This is imaginative, but not very smart. Plus, it means that the equals method is not symmetric. Eq: equals method compares class names rather than class objects (EQ_COMPARING_CLASS_NAMES)This method checks to see if two objects are the same class by checking to see if the names of their classes are equal. You can have different classes with the same name if they are loaded by different class loaders. Just check to see if the class objects are the same. Eq: Covariant equals() method defined for enum (EQ_DONT_DEFINE_EQUALS_FOR_ENUM)This class defines an enumeration, and equality on enumerations are defined using object identity. Definine a covariant equals method for an enumeration value is exceptionally bad practice, since it would likely result in having two different enumeration values that compare as equals using the covariant enum method, and as not equal when compared normally. Don't do it. Eq: equals method fails for subtypes (EQ_GETCLASS_AND_CLASS_CONSTANT) This class has an equals method that will be broken if it is inherited by subclasses.
It compares a class literal with the class of the argument (e.g., in class Eq: equals() method defined that doesn't override equals(Object) (EQ_OTHER_NO_OBJECT) This class defines an Eq: equals() method defined that doesn't override Object.equals(Object) (EQ_OTHER_USE_OBJECT) This class defines an Eq: equals method overrides equals in superclass and may not be symmetric (EQ_OVERRIDING_EQUALS_NOT_SYMMETRIC) This class defines an equals method that overrides an equals method in a superclass. Both equals methods
methods use Eq: Covariant equals() method defined, Object.equals(Object) inherited (EQ_SELF_USE_OBJECT) This class defines a covariant version of the FE: Doomed test for equality to NaN (FE_TEST_IF_EQUAL_TO_NOT_A_NUMBER)
This code checks to see if a floating point value is equal to the special
Not A Number value (e.g., GC: No relationship between generic parameter and method argument (GC_UNRELATED_TYPES)This call to a generic container's method contains an argument with a different class type from that of the container's parameter. Therefore, it is unlikely that the container contains any objects with the same type as the method argument used here. HE: Use of class without a hashCode() method in a hashed data structure (HE_USE_OF_UNHASHABLE_CLASS)A class defines an equals(Object) method but not a hashCode() method, and thus doesn't fulfill the requirement that equal Objects have equal hashCodes. An instance of this class is used in a hash data structure, making the need to fix this problem of highest importance. ICAST: Integer shift by an amount not in the range 0..31 (ICAST_BAD_SHIFT_AMOUNT)The code performs an integer shift by a constant amount outside the range 0..31. The effect of this is to use the lower 5 bits of the integer value to decide how much to shift by. This probably isn't want was expected, and it at least confusing. ICAST: int value cast to double and then passed to Math.ceil (ICAST_INT_CAST_TO_DOUBLE_PASSED_TO_CEIL)This code converts an int value to a double precision floating point number and then passing the result to the Math.ceil() function, which rounds a double to the next higher integer value. This operation should always be a no-op, since the converting an integer to a double should give a number with no fractional part. It is likely that the operation that generated the value to be passed to Math.ceil was intended to be performed using double precision floating point arithmetic. ICAST: int value cast to float and then passed to Math.round (ICAST_INT_CAST_TO_FLOAT_PASSED_TO_ROUND)This code converts an int value to a float precision floating point number and then passing the result to the Math.round() function, which returns the int/long closest to the argument. This operation should always be a no-op, since the converting an integer to a float should give a number with no fractional part. It is likely that the operation that generated the value to be passed to Math.round was intended to be performed using floating point arithmetic. IJU: JUnit assertion in run method will not be noticed by JUnit (IJU_ASSERT_METHOD_INVOKED_FROM_RUN_METHOD)A JUnit assertion is performed in a run method. Failed JUnit assertions just result in exceptions being thrown. Thus, if this exception occurs in a thread other than the thread that invokes the test method, the exception will terminate the thread but not result in the test failing. IJU: TestCase declares a bad suite method (IJU_BAD_SUITE_METHOD)Class is a JUnit TestCase and defines a suite() method. However, the suite method needs to be declared as either public static junit.framework.Test suite()or public static junit.framework.TestSuite suite() IJU: TestCase has no tests (IJU_NO_TESTS)Class is a JUnit TestCase but has not implemented any test methods IJU: TestCase implements setUp but doesn't call super.setUp() (IJU_SETUP_NO_SUPER)Class is a JUnit TestCase and implements the setUp method. The setUp method should call super.setUp(), but doesn't. IJU: TestCase implements a non-static suite method (IJU_SUITE_NOT_STATIC)Class is a JUnit TestCase and implements the suite() method. The suite method should be declared as being static, but isn't. IJU: TestCase implements tearDown but doesn't call super.tearDown() (IJU_TEARDOWN_NO_SUPER)Class is a JUnit TestCase and implements the tearDown method. The tearDown method should call super.tearDown(), but doesn't. IL: A container is added to itself (IL_CONTAINER_ADDED_TO_ITSELF)A container is added to itself. As a result, computing the hashCode of this set will throw a StackOverflowException. IL: An apparent infinite loop (IL_INFINITE_LOOP)This loop doesn't seem to have a way to terminate (other than by perhaps throwing an exception). IL: An apparent infinite recursive loop (IL_INFINITE_RECURSIVE_LOOP)This method unconditionally invokes itself. This would seem to indicate an infinite recursive loop that will result in a stack overflow. IM: Integer multiply of result of integer remainder (IM_MULTIPLYING_RESULT_OF_IREM)The code multiplies the result of an integer remaining by an integer constant. Be sure you don't have your operator precedence confused. For example i % 60 * 1000 is (i % 60) * 1000, not i % (60 * 1000). INT: Bad comparison of nonnegative value with negative constant (INT_BAD_COMPARISON_WITH_NONNEGATIVE_VALUE)This code compares a value that is guaranteed to be non-negative with a negative constant. INT: Bad comparison of signed byte (INT_BAD_COMPARISON_WITH_SIGNED_BYTE) Signed bytes can only have a value in the range -128 to 127. Comparing
a signed byte with a value outside that range is vacuous and likely to be incorrect.
To convert a signed byte INT: Integer remainder modulo 1 (INT_BAD_REM_BY_1)Any expression (exp % 1) is guaranteed to always return zero. Did you mean (exp & 1) or (exp % 2) instead? IO: Doomed attempt to append to an object output stream (IO_APPENDING_TO_OBJECT_OUTPUT_STREAM)This code opens a file in append mode and then wraps the result in an object output stream. This won't allow you to append to an existing object output stream stored in a file. If you want to be able to append to an object output stream, you need to keep the object output stream open. The only situation in which opening a file in append mode and the writing an object output stream could work is if on reading the file you plan to open it in random access mode and seek to the byte offset where the append started. TODO: example. IP: A parameter is dead upon entry to a method but overwritten (IP_PARAMETER_IS_DEAD_BUT_OVERWRITTEN)The initial value of this parameter is ignored, and the parameter is overwritten here. This often indicates a mistaken belief that the write to the parameter will be conveyed back to the caller. JCIP: Fields of immutable classes should be final (JCIP_FIELD_ISNT_FINAL_IN_IMMUTABLE_CLASS)The class is annotated with net.jcip.annotations.Immutable, and the rules for that annotation require that all fields are final. . MF: Class defines field that masks a superclass field (MF_CLASS_MASKS_FIELD)This class defines a field with the same name as a visible instance field in a superclass. This is confusing, and may indicate an error if methods update or access one of the fields when they wanted the other. MF: Method defines a variable that obscures a field (MF_METHOD_MASKS_FIELD)This method defines a local variable with the same name as a field in this class or a superclass. This may cause the method to read an uninitialized value from the field, leave the field uninitialized, or both. NP: Null pointer dereference (NP_ALWAYS_NULL) A null pointer is dereferenced here. This will lead to a
NP: Null pointer dereference in method on exception path (NP_ALWAYS_NULL_EXCEPTION) A pointer which is null on an exception path is dereferenced here.
This will lead to a Also note that FindBugs considers the default case of a switch statement to be an exception path, since the default case is often infeasible. NP: Method does not check for null argument (NP_ARGUMENT_MIGHT_BE_NULL)A parameter to this method has been identified as a value that should always be checked to see whether or not it is null, but it is being dereferenced without a preceding null check. NP: Null value is guaranteed to be dereferenced (NP_GUARANTEED_DEREF)There is a statement or branch that if executed guarantees that a value is null at this point, and that value that is guaranteed to be dereferenced (except on forward paths involving runtime exceptions). NP: Value is null and guaranteed to be dereferenced on exception path (NP_GUARANTEED_DEREF_ON_EXCEPTION_PATH)There is a statement or branch on an exception path that if executed guarantees that a value is null at this point, and that value that is guaranteed to be dereferenced (except on forward paths involving runtime exceptions). NP: Method call passes null to a nonnull parameter (NP_NONNULL_PARAM_VIOLATION)This method passes a null value as the parameter of a method which must be nonnull. Either this parameter has been explicitly marked as @Nonnull, or analysis has determined that this parameter is always dereferenced. NP: Method may return null, but is declared @NonNull (NP_NONNULL_RETURN_VIOLATION)This method may return a null value, but the method (or a superclass method which it overrides) is declared to return @NonNull. NP: A known null value is checked to see if it is an instance of a type (NP_NULL_INSTANCEOF)This instanceof test will always return false, since the value being checked is guaranteed to be null. Although this is safe, make sure it isn't an indication of some misunderstanding or some other logic error. NP: Possible null pointer dereference (NP_NULL_ON_SOME_PATH) There is a branch of statement that, if executed, guarantees that
a null value will be dereferenced, which
would generate a NP: Possible null pointer dereference in method on exception path (NP_NULL_ON_SOME_PATH_EXCEPTION) A reference value which is null on some exception control path is
dereferenced here. This may lead to a Also note that FindBugs considers the default case of a switch statement to be an exception path, since the default case is often infeasible. NP: Method call passes null for unconditionally dereferenced parameter (NP_NULL_PARAM_DEREF)This method call passes a null value to a method which might dereference it unconditionally. NP: Method call passes null for unconditionally dereferenced parameter (NP_NULL_PARAM_DEREF_ALL_TARGETS_DANGEROUS)A possibly-null value is passed at a call site where all known target methods will unconditionally dereference it. This is very likely to result in a null pointer exception. NP: Non-virtual method call passes null for unconditionally dereferenced parameter (NP_NULL_PARAM_DEREF_NONVIRTUAL)A possibly-null value is passed to a method which unconditionally dereferences it. This will almost certainly result in a null pointer exception. NP: Store of null value into field annotated NonNull (NP_STORE_INTO_NONNULL_FIELD)A value that could be null is stored into a field that has been annotated as NonNull. NP: Read of unwritten field (NP_UNWRITTEN_FIELD)The program is dereferencing a field that does not seem to ever have a non-null value written to it. Dereferencing this value will generate a null pointer exception. Nm: Class defines equal(); should it be equals()? (NM_BAD_EQUAL) This class defines a method Nm: Class defines hashcode(); should it be hashCode()? (NM_LCASE_HASHCODE) This class defines a method called Nm: Class defines tostring(); should it be toString()? (NM_LCASE_TOSTRING) This class defines a method called Nm: Apparent method/constructor confusion (NM_METHOD_CONSTRUCTOR_CONFUSION)This regular method has the same name as the class it is defined in. It is likely that this was intended to be a constructor. If it was intended to be a constructor, remove the declaration of a void return value. If you had accidently defined this method, realized the mistake, defined a proper constructor but can't get rid of this method due to backwards compatibility, deprecate the method. Nm: Very confusing method names (NM_VERY_CONFUSING)The referenced methods have names that differ only by capitalization. This is very confusing because if the capitalization were identical then one of the methods would override the other. Nm: Method doesn't override method in superclass due to wrong package for parameter (NM_WRONG_PACKAGE)The method in the subclass doesn't override a similar method in a superclass because the type of a parameter doesn't exactly match the type of the corresponding parameter in the superclass. For example, if you have:
The QBA: Method assigns boolean literal in boolean expression (QBA_QUESTIONABLE_BOOLEAN_ASSIGNMENT)This method assigns a literal boolean value (true or false) to a boolean variable inside an if or while expression. Most probably this was supposed to be a boolean comparison using ==, not an assignment using =. RCN: Nullcheck of value previously dereferenced (RCN_REDUNDANT_NULLCHECK_WOULD_HAVE_BEEN_A_NPE)A value is checked here to see whether it is null, but this value can't be null because it was previously dereferenced and if it were null a null pointer exception would have occurred at the earlier dereference. Essentially, this code and the previous dereference disagree as to whether this value is allowed to be null. Either the check is redundant or the previous dereference is erroneous. RE: Invalid syntax for regular expression (RE_BAD_SYNTAX_FOR_REGULAR_EXPRESSION)The code here uses a regular expression that is invalid according to the syntax for regular expressions. This statement will throw a PatternSyntaxException when executed. RE: File.separator used for regular expression (RE_CANT_USE_FILE_SEPARATOR_AS_REGULAR_EXPRESSION)
The code here uses RE: "." used for regular expression (RE_POSSIBLE_UNINTENDED_PATTERN)A String function is being invoked and "." is being passed to a parameter that takes a regular expression as an argument. Is this what you intended? For example s.replaceAll(".", "/") will return a String in which every character has been replaced by a / character. RV: Random value from 0 to 1 is coerced to the integer 0 (RV_01_TO_INT)A random value from 0 to 1 is being coerced to the integer value 0. You probably
want to multiple the random value by something else before coercing it to an integer, or use the RV: Bad attempt to compute absolute value of signed 32-bit hashcode (RV_ABSOLUTE_VALUE_OF_HASHCODE) This code generates a hashcode and then computes
the absolute value of that hashcode. If the hashcode
is RV: Bad attempt to compute absolute value of signed 32-bit random integer (RV_ABSOLUTE_VALUE_OF_RANDOM_INT) This code generates a random signed integer and then computes
the absolute value of that random integer. If the number returned by the random number
generator is RV: Exception created and dropped rather than thrown (RV_EXCEPTION_NOT_THROWN)This code creates an exception (or error) object, but doesn't do anything with it. For example, something like
It was probably the intent of the programmer to throw the created exception:
RV: Method ignores return value (RV_RETURN_VALUE_IGNORED)The return value of this method should be checked. One common cause of this warning is to invoke a method on an immutable object, thinking that it updates the object. For example, in the following code fragment, String dateString = getHeaderField(name); dateString.trim(); the programmer seems to be thinking that the trim() method will update the String referenced by dateString. But since Strings are immutable, the trim() function returns a new String value, which is being ignored here. The code should be corrected to: String dateString = getHeaderField(name); dateString = dateString.trim(); SA: Double assignment of field (SA_FIELD_DOUBLE_ASSIGNMENT)This method contains a double assignment of a field; e.g.
int x,y;
public void foo() {
x = x = 17;
}
Assigning to a field twice is useless, and may indicate a logic error or typo. SA: Self assignment of field (SA_FIELD_SELF_ASSIGNMENT)This method contains a self assignment of a field; e.g.
int x;
public void foo() {
x = x;
}
Such assignments are useless, and may indicate a logic error or typo. SA: Self comparison of field with itself (SA_FIELD_SELF_COMPARISON)This method compares a field with itself, and may indicate a typo or a logic error. Make sure that you are comparing the right things. SA: Nonsensical self computat |